In Which Sometimes Things Just Go Well
Today was one of those days in which even the frustrating things added up to a harmonious whole. I had two classes today, a 1A and a 4A, at different schools. My 1A has five students, who are as rambunctious as the six- and seven-year-olds they are. They finally began to settle into the class routine today, and we didn't even lose much time of actual curriculum to acheive it. Even better, I think it's sustainable.
In my 4A class, we wrote silly questions as preparation for writing a paragraph, or set of paragraphs. My students will be writing about things like "Why do polar bears like chocolate?" "How big is the sky?" "How much water is there in the ocean?" and "Why does Joe laugh all the time?" During the break time, they drew a butterfly on my hand with facepaint sticks.
After the 4A class, I went to Subway to grab a very quick sandwich before the open house at the first school. The sandwich I got had very little on it, but it was sustenance. Nevertheless, I don't think I'll go back there at night. It occasioned a pleasant conversation with another teacher, however, who thought of me and wanted to know if I wanted anything when he went to get dinner. I declined, but the overture of friendship was nice.
The open house was even better. The parents of three of my students came in, listened to the general speeches and introductions, and then came to my classroom to talk to me. They cared about the education of their children. They asked pertinent questions and raised well-considered issues. They brought up the ways in which their children were feeling frustrated, and about what they felt confident. They were eager to participate themselves in their children's education, and when they left, one of them shook my hand and said, "We are lucky to meet you."
And after all of that, I met with the manager for Columbia Schools to talk about a proposed change in the presentation of the curriculum for my Saturday class. It's a group of teenagers, bored, on Saturday morning, with vastly different skill levels. Different kids are coming and going all the time, so it's challenging to keep the whole class on the same page, and would be even if they were willing to lift their eyes above the level of their knees. I want to make the class into a game like I have mentioned here previously. I described to our manager what I wanted to do, and when she understood, she said, "Yes. Please do this. And if it works at all, please let me know, because we want to watch it happen and see if we can use it for the other Saturday classes." I couldn't have been more thrilled.
I walked to the MRT station through the courtyard of the Chiang Kai Shek Memorial Hall and felt pretty good about life.
Showing posts with label education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label education. Show all posts
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Thursday, June 25, 2009
Choices
In Which Death Is Mentioned, Society Is Further Maligned, And More Seeds Of Future Posts Are Sown
We went to the beach. I put those pictures up some time ago. It was a good time - a group of mutually benevolent people hanging out with a relative minimum of high-school behavior. Afterward we came back and I opened my box.
It was a little boring, to be honest. The most consistent predictions were that I'd no longer be vegetarian (false), that I'd have a cat (also false), and that I'd be married with a kid or two (1/3 true - the marriage isn't probably what they meant, and while I've got some 40 to 50 kids, it's not quite in the same way). I'm hoping the next one will be better, or at least more interesting.
We also went to Ali Shan when Katy's friend Aidan was here. I didn't really feel like there was enough time to do anything there, but the train ride was cool.
I went back to Yingge with Thomas, who's going back to Australia in a few weeks to start law school. He made a saki set. I made a few more containers of various sorts. We ate at a delightful restaurant of a hole-in-the-wall variety, and then came back for a TED talks gathering chez Katy and Rowan. In some ways it's very nice to have a bunch of intelligent friends with whom to discuss ideas. On the other hand, I do get the impression that we often intellectualize happiness into non-existence.
Our jobs here are the same as ever: the same challenges, the same rewards. My H-class put on a play that none of us wanted to do for parents who resented having to take the time to watch it, so that our director could stress out and try to make us stress out, all for the sake of face.
Which brings me, indirectly, to the next point. Last week, someone we met here near the beginning of our stay committed suicide.
Now, I'm pretty isolated here, and I have a feeling that this is making my viewpoints less and less connected with the society I left in the United States, so take what follows with a shaker-full of Pacific salt. Death isn't an easy thing to process at the simplest of times, and it gets more complicated when it's a choice someone's making. We humans sometimes get offended by much less permanent choices, like who someone marries or how someone cuts his hair. We get positively irate over choices like where to eat or what color to paint the house. When someone chooses to die... we don't know what to do. We feel guilty, usually, and sad, and probably angry. We think, "If only I'd done X," or "Why didn't he/she value me/my friendship enough to live?" or "Now I will never see him/her again." We think that our existence ought to have had more bearing on their decision. A decision as final as death, though, is sometimes a response to exactly that kind of pressure from friends or family or co-workers or society. Family members tell someone to live his life this way, friends advise something else, co-workers say "just do this," society tells him to put on a happy face and be strong, and no one takes the time to let him do or even say what he'd prefer. It is too frequently entirely unimportant. From the time people enter school until they retire - most of their lives - they are battered by a constant onslaught of opposing pressures to do a very narrow set of things and practice a vary narrow set of behaviors. You're an American girl who doesn't shave her legs? SHAME. You're a Taiwanese boy who wants to be an artist? FIE. When there's no real outlet for personal happiness or even opinion, the only way people can assert their right to control their own lives, it often seems to them, is to end them.
So we should feel guilty, I suppose. We should, but not in the narcissistic manner to which we're accustomed. We shouldn't feel guilty because we as individuals were so important to a person that by one action or lack thereof we could have made them realize that life was worth living. That is simply not the case. We should feel guilty collectively. A person's decision to die should make us consider whether we've allowed others the room to be themselves, or if we've decided that we are so omniscient that we know exactly how they should proceed with the rest of their lives, and that we're so important that we have the right to deny them the right to ever choose anything again.
To end on a brighter note, I found a little children's book recently in Chinese that is the first chapter of a book I read growing up and have always sort of loved: The Finn Family Moomintroll. It is the inspiration, in fact, for my sub-headings. I was very glad to get it. It's relatively easy to read, but I'm learning new words with it, too.
Next up, I hope, the long promised entry about education.
Saturday, April 11, 2009
The Game
In Which Public Education Is Roundly Abused, And Rowan Is Decidedly Delinquent In Her Updates
Some time ago, when your negligent (my deepest apologies, again) guide was but a tot, my father and I played a game. We, being imaginative souls, called it "The Game." (A recently ironic name, since The Wife and I have taken to calling Society "The Game.") The Game of old was based on a large square of maroon canvas, various pieces of felt and wood, and an abiding and dedicated sense of curiosity.
The canvas was a map - those of you with predilections for scoffing may begin now at this clear reference and precursor to tabletop gaming - and the smaller squares of felt were decorated with trees and mountains, caves, lakes and streams, farms and fields, anything my small, voracious brain could conjure as an appropriate backdrop for adventure. We sewed them ourselves.
Using this constantly changing terrain as a geographical guide, my father told me stories in which I was expected to participate (I doubt very much whether he or the proverbial wild horses could have stopped me) by answering questions and choosing directions and courses of action. I might have been unable to cross a bridge until I brushed up on my French because a troll was guarding it and wanted an answer to "Est-ce que ceci n'est pas une pipe?" I would have to go learn what the troll was saying (and possibly look into surrealist artists) and figure out the right answer before I could cross and continue. Maybe there was an item priced in lira when all I had were pesos, and I'd have to find the correct change. Perhaps a dragon or ghost appeared in a dream, demanding that I tell them the name of the secret malefactress in the book I was reading at the time. It was a game that stitched together the sometimes disappointing mundanity of the waking world and the wildly colorful and challenging scenarios of my imagination, and my father's. It was a multiplayer game without the computer, a mix of Carmen Sandiego and the brothers Grimm, in which I was both character and storyteller, in equal parts.
I loved it.
"But Rowan," say my Patient and Forgiving readers, "what on Earth has this to do with Taiwan?" Well, my Gentle Public, today I went to the orphanage again, something I have now done four times, and began a very basic variant of that Game. I presented Ken (either he's changed his name or everyone's been getting it wrong all this time) with a little green notebook in which I had written the following:
One day, you find a book. On the cover, there is a picture of a crying woman. When you pick up the book, you see a ghost. The ghost says: "Do you have any threes?"I had him read it aloud, and then we played Go Fish, in which we practiced the constructions "Do you have _____? Yes, I have two _____s. No, I don't have any ______s." I played up the character of the challenging specter, and Ken took great pleasure in trouncing me, gleefully using the correct English phrases the whole time.
I am brought thence to the subject of Public Education, which can be roughly defined as the practice of carefully and thoroughly eradicating our children's desire to learn. Children seem to naturally thrive on curiosity and its satisfaction, and regularly reach out for more information and more answers and more questions. The kids in my lower level classes have to be restrained from gathering around the whiteboard in their enthusiasm to write the words correctly (and how counter-productive is that idea? making sure that children never believe they have a place in educating themselves), and jump at the chance to answer questions and play games and draw and learn. The upper level classes, after a period of slightly caustic wariness, also settle into an honest desire to wield knowledge with skill and inquiry. All it takes to encourage them is a concrete and consistent set of rules (not too many, not too unreasonable), and a genuine desire to share what you know and learn alongside them when you've no idea.
Why is this so hard to come by?
Sunday, March 15, 2009
Reflecting
In Which I Do Hope The Readers Will Bear With Me
I went to Ghana, stayed 5 1/2 months, and learned how people are the same, and what brings us together. Here I am in Taiwan, just passing the 7 month mark in a probably 24 month stay, and I'm learning about all the ways we do our damnedest to keep ourselves estranged.
When I was growing up, I was told I could do anything I wanted to, be anyone I liked. This is a very American concept. It is also a very American lie. While it is true that, technically speaking, I can do anything I want, no one mentions the consequences. No one says to a four-year-old, of course, honey, anything you want, unless it's being a garbage collector, because then people won't respect you. We have constructed for ourselves a giant isolated bubble in which negative consequences are universally to be avoided. Anything with any negative side effects at all - any decision that rates a black look from the neighbors, any accidental step that makes us "look bad," in short, any mistake - is ruthlessly weeded out of the society we have so carefully constructed around ourselves. It's very easily done, too. We do it by the extremely simple expedient of offering our children carefully tailored choices. By the time most of us get old enough to realize that we can make our own choices, we're so accustomed to having them all but made for us that we don't know what to do. We just go on with the plan, get a job that pays the bills and is otherwise totally mundane and uninteresting, get married, have the requisite 2.3 children and wonder vaguely why we feel so damn unprepared for all of it. Most of us have some kind of crisis after college (Oh God, not Real Life!), and another at 45 (What have I done with my life?), and if we're lucky we manage to keep it down to two and slip into resigned acceptance of the way our lives have turned out.
Being nudged into this kind of society with a well meaning You can do whatever you want is somewhat akin to being taken by your very particular Uncle Steve to the biggest bookstore in the world and told to choose just one in the space of an hour. You know that there is a right one, or at least a right several, and that you will be judged on your choice.
What am I learning here? Partly that it is too late for me, in many ways. This world is no longer my world, and I have wasted my time in it browsing shelves in the areas of the bookstore that Uncle Steve doesn't care for. I can no longer labor under the pretense that it is my story in which I'm living. My story left me competent in nothing but learning. "Well," said a friend, "What a useful skill," and I agree wholeheartedly, but it is not, unfortunately, a terribly marketable one. Sadly, marketability sets the boundaries of this no-longer-mine world that I live in, so I am left, in effect, not a useful member of a society that doesn't value real education.
I've spent quite a lot of time thinking about this, and it troubles me. It is, as I've said, too late for me. I will never be the kind of person that society - as it is - welcomes with open arms and a friendly word. At best, this society will leave me alone with no more than a half-admiring, half-bewildered sidelong glance. But it is not, perhaps, too late for the kids who are now who I was. This world now belongs to people who are right now running on small, unsteady, bare feet under swing-sets, reaching for stuffed animals, being carried by grandparents. People even now being told that they can do whatever they want to do. I cannot make the world into one that accepts me, or them, but perhaps I can offer them a space and a chance at self-awareness and true choice.
This is all leading up to a later discussion of the problem of education and potential solutions, but this part had to come first.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)